Showing posts with label Philadelphia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philadelphia. Show all posts
PHILADELPHIA - JULY 21: Philadelphia Union fans cheer during the game against Manchester United at Lincoln Financial Field on July 21, 2010 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Photo by Drew Hallowell/Getty Images)

Like it or not, soccer fan culture in cities across the United States and Canada will naturally reflect the character of the particular city. Individually speaking, this means that the supporters for an MLS team are going to act like fans from other sports. Maybe they'll sing a little more. Maybe they'll have drums or chant in Spanish due to a larger Latino makeup. But for the most part, New Yorkers are going to act like New Yorkers, Chicagoans like Chicagoans, Philadelphians like Philadelphians, etc., etc.


And those Philadelphians like to curse if you haven't heard, or if you've simply ignored the fan behavior at Phillies, Flyers, Eagles, and Sixers games over the years. In most cases more than a few fans aren't doing it in unison, so the extent of aural destruction is limited. Get a couple hundred or thousand fans on the same page, however, and you have a chorus of profanity washing over everyone and everything in its path like a wall of dirty sound. It's not what Phil Spector had in mind. Because soccer promotes this coordinated chanting like no other sport, the profanity is generally much clearer and more easily noticed.


Which is a problem when uptight tourists visit a stadium containing passionate rowdies, and do so expecting a quiet family-friendly day of watching their favorite foreign powerhouse club. There are a lot of Manchester United fans, for whatever reason, and when the Red Devils come Stateside for the first time in years, those fans flock in droves. As moths to the overpriced flame, they're simply appalled (APPALLED!) when those disgusting local fans - dressed in the colors of the lowly MLS team whom they value their real connection with - yell out a resounding "F**k You!" or "You Suck A**hole!"


How cute, those delicate sensibilities.


Whether or not it's right for those fans to curse, or whether their use of the language is a touch...basic, is a debate for a different day. The former is a matter of taste and what one expects from fans at a sporting event. There are lines that shouldn't be crossed, and fans should be careful not to cross them. I don't see simple cursing as that, usually. There are times when it's not called for and repetitive use is distasteful; more than anything, it just grates on the ears to hear fans resort to profanity to express themselves rather than create something clever. American soccer crowds too often lack for creativity.


But if Philly fans, at all sporting events, curse, why should we want or expect anything different at a Union match? Screw soccer exceptionalism, I want my American soccer crowds to be just like their football, baseball, and hockey equivalents but with that little bit of extra flair. Soccer crowds should be unique because they're soccer crowds; that doesn't mean they should be watered down versions of crowds at other sporting events, it means they should be the exact opposite. Louder. More coordinated. A better representation of the passion they have for the sport and their team. Since we're talking Philly, they should be more Philly.


I'm not advocating more cursing. I'm advocating that they use it wisely to its greatest effect and they stay true to their Philly-ness. American soccer culture is American sports culture with a twist. And it should be.


Now that I've bored you to tears will all of this, I should reveal the source of my inspiration. After attending the Union-Manchester United game, someone decided to lambaste Union fans for their choice of words. Most of it is uptight nonsense. Subsequently the author apologized for mistaking a non-profane chant for "F*ck You!", which takes much of the sting out of the "controversy." If I didn't know better, I'd think the entire thing was a concoction meant to rile up Union fans and set off a firestorm. The post is certainly getting a lot of attention, with links from more bloggers than you can shake a stick at.


The retraction doesn't change my feelings on the issue, and I'll defend the fans' right to use any words they choose that aren't racist, homophobic, or make light of a tragic loss of life. In fact, I almost wish the Philly fans had been chanting what the writer thought they were chanting.


More bothersome to me than the objection to perceived bad words is the idea that an American Manchester United fan should feel an obligation to apologize to the English fans in the crowd on behalf of their countrymen. What? There are almost no words to describe how ridiculous this is, both from a visiting-fan perspective (forget where the fans individually came from; Manchester United were the visitors, which makes their fans the visiting fans) and because it indicates a tragically mistaken view on the niceties of football. Here's the truth: there are none. Even as we speak, MLS is slowly shedding the family-friendly soccer mom label it embraced for too long; professional soccer matches around the world, and yes, also in England, are attended by adult supporters who curse, curse often, and curse loudly. There's nothing for which the Union fans should be ashamed. Britain is not populated by a race of super-polite cheery gents who never curse and will always invite you over for tea. Sports can be crude and impolite, and this is part of their appeal.


Think of soccer in American like you would any other sporting event, consider the locale you're visiting, and prepare accordingly. If you find yourself with even the smallest doubt about the level of behavior at the game, don't go.


For a similar take to mine, see Aaron Stollar's at Fighting Talker.




Members of the U.S. men's national soccer team stand on a makeshift soccer field as the team is officially announced at the ESPN headquarters in Bristol

I'm headed up to Philly tomorrow to take in the last domestic warm up match before the US National Team boards a plane with our hopes and dreams shoved firmly in their pockets. I'll be going as a fan, which means my insight will be that of a fan; the experience of cheering on your team in person will never really allow for in-depth breakdowns of individual performances and tactics, but it might provide a grander sense of how the team plays as a whole.


Which is why I'm glad that this is the game I'm able to make, that Bradley has announced his intention to put a team that will be as close to his first choice lineup as is possible, and that I'll be in the stadium to see them play together. Of course I'll be closely watching Onyewu, looking for any lingering vision issues with DeMerit, anxiously assessing the play of whichever forward Bradley sends out, etc., etc.; all of that behavior is the price I pay for writing a blog, the kind of thing I can't avoid even if I wanted to.


But I know that I'll also be distracted. It will be nearly impossible to properly track the game in a way that would result in any meaningful conclusions beyond the most general. Maybe I'll record it at home and review it later. Maybe not.


Either way, I'm going to enjoy being a fan tomorrow. I can't make it to South Africa, so this is as close as I'm going to get to seeing World Cup soccer.


Although I'm sure they won't agree it's warranted, the excitement I'm feeling today and the experience I hope to have tomorrow makes me pity those in the blogging world that choose to set themselves apart as unbiased analysts of the sport (not the pros though; they get paid, which trumps missing out on the fan experience). It's their chosen path, sure, but by removing themselves from the passionate aspects of soccer they've forsaking a major component of appreciating the sport. It can make people callous and cynical, because they lose (or never had) the ability to see things from a fan's perspective. Even the most irrational among us gets to enjoy the game in a way those analysts never can, and though it's difficult to place a value on experience because it is so personal from individual to individual, I can't help but think they're missing out on something big.


Still, they're a needed part of the ever-evolving fabric of American soccer, and so I should probably just shut up now.


I digress. Philly here I come.


If you'll be in Philly as well, drop me a line somehow, maybe we can meet up for a beer or just to shake hands.


Friendly Angst: US Schedules Turkey

Wednesday, February 17, 2010 | View Comments
FINANCIAL FIELD STADIUM

Add Turkey to the USMNT's pre-World Cup schedule; the UEFA nation will visit Philadelphia on May 29th, the last friendly before the Americans head off to South Africa and their date with England (not to mention Algeria and Slovenia).


It's nice to the schedule begin to fill out a bit, and though many fans will wonder why there aren't more friendlies set, a match against Turkey will be a strong test against a side with plenty of pride to play for after failing to make the World Cup themselves. Better yet, I can't imagine that the Turkish diaspora in the United States will be descending on Philly in large enough numbers to ruin a home send off, making the match a smart move simply from a "feel good" perspective.


The Turkey match alone won't be enough to sate everyone, of course. There still seems to be a large portion of the fan base mildly concerned that the US hasn't already scheduled more matches, and more matches against quality opponents. While Mexico sets up six match tours of the US, the Americans have only booked games against the Netherlands (March 3rd) and Turkey.


Not that Mexico is really testing themselves with matches against the likes of Iceland (ranked 94th), New Zealand (a World Cup team, but ranked 79th), and Senegal (ranked 91st). Are the Americans' two matches worth more in a "quality over quantity" sense than the Mexican full slate? Maybe, but since the American preparations are an individual concern that really has nothing to do with anyone else, it doesn't really matter. Make note of the last date on the Mexican tour, the match set for Reliant Stadium in Houston; the opponent is "TBD" and could end up being the United States.


Perhaps more aptly assessed is the warm-up schedules of the Americans' Group C opponents, England, Algeria, and Slovenia. It's those three sides the US will need to get enough points off of to advance to the knockout rounds anyway, so it might be a better to take a look at their plans*:


England

3/3 versus Egypt, at Wembley Stadium, London


Algeria

3/3 versus Serbia, at Stade du 5 Julliet, Algiers

5/29 versus Ireland at Croke Park, Dublin


Slovenia

3/3 versus Qatar, Petrol Arena, Cleje, Slovenia


*These are the dates I could confirm with a cursory search of the web and federations sites.


In comparison, the US schedule is fine. In fact, the US schedule looks pretty good all things considered, especially with the stern test that the Netherlands will present in only a few weeks. Remember that between now and the send-off match against Turkey that the only FIFA date is March 3rd.


How does everyone feel about facing Turkey in Philly?

*UPDATE* Add Czech Republic on May 25th at a location to be determined (Rentschler Field at in Hartford is among the rumors) to the USMNT schedule, per a US Soccer press release today.


MLS Philly Gets a Name

Monday, May 11, 2009 | View Comments

If you haven't already heard, Philadelphia's new MLS teams has officially been dubbed "Philadelphia Union".

It's not the worst thing that could have happened, and the crest and colors are fairly nice. It's good to see the new club follow Seattle's lead and actually listen to their prospective fan base, rather than to run off on their own and screw everything up.

Since I don't have time to go in-depth on Philly's name, I thought I'd re-post something I wrote on the issue of club naming way back in the formative days of the blog (i.e., four months ago).

If you've already read it, I apologize.

Today, a subject much lighter than my usual fare, but one which seems to inflame more passion than most; MLS naming conventions. Philadelphia is following Seattle's lead and is conducting a naming contest. The four rumored choices certainly don't smack of creativity, and there is much discussion on the subject (don't click if you're offended by four letter words for the male anatomy).

In the early years of MLS, the league took a purely "American" approach to naming teams. The founding members of the league were given ridiculous nicknames that not only adhered to our traditional city-nickname format, but also made use of an ugly late 90's trend of singular nicknames (i.e. Galaxy, Revolution, United, Burn, Wiz, Crew, Clash, Mutiny). Only two teams were given names outside of this convention: New York/New Jersey MetroStars (hideous for other reasons) and Colorado Rapids. Kansas City was changed from "Wiz" to "Wizards" before the '97 season, a change brought on by a lawsuit rather than a sudden awakening on the part of the organization.

Recent years have seen a reversal; in the new MLS, teams are striving to emulate the aura of European sides with names like "Real" and "FC". Real Salt Lake is truly unfortunate, a name that went way too far towards a European model, using the "Real" designation when it's truly not warranted (for background, please see the history of Real Madrid). Toronto FC is derided on several levels in North American soccer circles, both for the bare bones nature of the name and for the use of "FC" in a country (and culture) where the game is called "soccer" rather than "football" (not to mention being officially "FC" and not "Football Club"). In a refreshing twist, Seattle's effort to pin a Euro-name on their new expansion club was met with a write-in campaign and a compromise in Seattle Sounders FC. It seems the best of both worlds, although again we see "FC" where perhaps "SC" is more appropriate.

The whole thing is one big mess, the type of issue that seems innocuous, but may indicate the flavor of the game in the U.S. If we let ourselves be led around by our tails when it comes to naming our teams, how can we expect to establish our own identity in any aspect of the beautiful game?

I've always leaned towards the Euro model, if only because the traditional American one has led to such abominations when the decisions are left to the minds of all-to-clever marketing departments. The Sounders result could represent a sea-change going forward, but only if Philly doesn't follow up that success story with a return to the recent norm.

I won't be a Philadelphia fan, so I'll recuse myself from the voting; if I was to choose, I guess I would lukewarmly select Philadelphia City. The name seems the most appropriate of the rumored four, and gives Philly fans a chance to organically nickname their side.

According to the MLS Philly website, voting will start on the January 19th; I guess it's a good sign that they appear in tune with the Internet rumor mill.

Feel free to state your opinion, especially if you're from Philly and plan to support the team.


I think I still would have preferred "City", but "Union" isn't a bad second choice.


Franchise News II, Plus Stadiums

Wednesday, March 18, 2009 | View Comments
Alright, so my crappy day job effectively killed my attempts to include these things earlier, and I'm back to finish the job.

Sources Say Portland's In-As I correctly surmised (without so much as a contact in PDX), that little $15 million shortfall wasn't enough to kill the Portland bid. The boys from Oregon are in, and I'm very happy for it. I think the trifecta rivalry that Vancouver, Seattle, and Portland will bring to MLS is a huge plus for the league. It's very possible that the league's thinking followed the same lines, though the strength of the bids and the stadium setups were obviously the first concerns.

The Oregonian: Sources: MLS bringing soccer team to Portland

Puerto Rico Islanders in MLS?-In an effort to stay on the expansion tip before I wander into stadium territory, a thought occured to me last night after the Puerto Rico Islanders beat Cruz Azul 2-0 in San Juan; how soon until we hear that Puerto Rico is an expansion candidate? Garber intimated today at the Vancouver expansion announcement that the league will award two new franchises for 2012 (another year of expansion talk, yea!); although the usual suspects of St. Louis, Montreal, Miami, etc. will certainly be in the mix, why wouldn't Puerto Rico also be a player?

DC United Supporters Rally for PG Stadium-After abandoning the idea of ever building a soccer stadium in DC, United have moved on to Prince George's County, and have enlisted their supporters to aid in the cause. Hoping to give lawmakers in the Maryland county a sense of the support United has, Kevin Payne and company laid it out for their rabid fans; show up in Annapolis and help us get things moving. Below is a video of the rally, which included (in the reports I saw) about sixty supporters.



Chester Stadium Gets Pilings-On the surface, pilings being driven for the new Philadelphia franchise's (give us something to call them already!) Chester, PA stadium is pretty boring stuff. For Philly MLS fans and those of us excited to see another team in then I-95 corridor, though, it's pretty exciting. The Sons of Ben, still prominent and still getting in the local papers, must be doing somersaults. In fact, they are, and here's the proof:

Delco Times: Stadium Springs to Life on Chester Waterfront

And because stadium renderings are always fun to look at, here's one of the Chester Stadium (I have no idea if it will actually look this way, but this pops up in Google Image Search for "Chester stadium")




Barcelona could be moving their MLS investment dollars to Philadelphia. The Spanish club sent an envoy to the City of Brotherly Love at the end of February, and while both the Philly group and Barca are declining to comment on any discussions that might have taken place, it seems that the death of the Miami expansion bid wasn't the last we'll hear about Barcelona and MLS.

It's just such an odd pairing. I can't think of two major cities that have less in common than Philadelphia and Barcelona.

I'm fine with Barca looking for another way into the league as long as it doesn't mean we'll have a Barca-branded team. I was against "Barca-Miami" from the start, and I would certainly vomit repeatedly if Phildelphia ends up as "Barca Philadelphia" or some such nonsense. It's no secret that the Philly ownership group needs an infusion of cash, and I certainly can't fault them is Barca come calling with checkbook in hand.

SF at The Offside Rules brings up the disconcerting possibility that FCB's involvment could be the reason we haven't heard a name and colors announcement our of Philly. I sure as hell hope that's not the case.

Thoughts?


The Way We Name or FC? FU!

Wednesday, January 14, 2009 | View Comments
Today, a subject much lighter than my usual fare, but one which seems to inflame more passion than most; MLS naming conventions. Philadelphia is following Seattle's lead and is conducting a naming contest. The four rumored choices certainly don't smack of creativity, and there is much discussion on the subject (don't click if you're offended by four letter words for the male anatomy).

In the early years of MLS, the league took a purely "American" approach to naming teams. The founding members of the league were given ridiculous nicknames that not only adhered to our traditional city-nickname format, but also made use of an ugly late 90's trend of singular nicknames (i.e. Galaxy, Revolution, United, Burn, Wiz, Crew, Clash, Mutiny). Only two teams were given names outside of this convention: New York/New Jersey MetroStars (hideous for other reasons) and Colorado Rapids. Kansas City was changed from "Wiz" to "Wizards" before the '97 season, a change brought on by a lawsuit rather than a sudden awakening on the part of the organization.

Recent years have seen a reversal; in the new MLS, teams are striving to emulate the aura of European sides with names like "Real" and "FC". Real Salt Lake is truly unfortunate, a name that went way too far towards a European model, using the "Real" designation when it's truly not warranted (for background, please see the history of Real Madrid). Toronto FC is derided on several levels in North American soccer circles, both for the bare bones nature of the name and for the use of "FC" in a country (and culture) where the game is called "soccer" rather than "football" (not to mention being officially "FC" and not "Football Club"). In a refreshing twist, Seattle's effort to pin a Euro-name on their new expansion club was met with a write-in campaign and a compromise in Seattle Sounders FC. It seems the best of both worlds, although again we see "FC" where perhaps "SC" is more appropriate.

The whole thing is one big mess, the type of issue that seems innocuous, but may indicate the flavor of the game in the U.S. If we let ourselves be led around by our tails when it comes to naming our teams, how can we expect to establish our own identity in any aspect of the beautiful game?

I've always leaned towards the Euro model, if only because the traditional American one has led to such abominations when the decisions are left to the minds of all-to-clever marketing departments. The Sounders result could represent a sea-change going forward, but only if Philly doesn't follow up that success story with a return to the recent norm.

I won't be a Philadelphia fan, so I'll recuse myself from the voting; if I was to choose, I guess I would lukewarmly select Philadelphia City. The name seems the most appropriate of the rumored four, and gives Philly fans a chance to organically nickname their side.

According to the MLS Philly website, voting will start on the January 19th; I guess it's a good sign that they appear in tune with the Internet rumor mill.

Feel free to state your opinion, especially if you're from Philly and plan to support the team.


    KKTC Bahis Siteleri, Online Bahis

    Legal


    Privacy Policy