Showing posts with label Sacha Kljestan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sacha Kljestan. Show all posts
June 17, 2010 - Anderlecht, BELGIUM - epa02207184 US player Sacha Kljestan (L) and Anderlecht's manager Herman Van Holsbeeck pose at the Constant Vanden Stock stadium, with a shirt of RSCA Anderlecht after a press conference in Anderlecht, 17 June 2010. Midfielder Kljestan is one of RSCA Anderlecht's new acquisitions.

As I begin this post, Sacha Kljestan has just scored in his debut for Anderlecht. The Belgian club are playing a Champions League qualifier against Welsh Premier League side The New Saints, and while the competition is hardly strong (The New Saints' home ground has a capacity of 2,000, and the club was called "Total Network Solutions FC" until four years ago), an American scoring in European competition is still rare enough to be notable. Hell, an American scoring almost anywhere outside of the US is still notable on some level.


Sacha's goal has prompted me to consider what his move might mean to those of us watching from the States, being the ardent Americans abroad-watchers that we are. Kljestan's progress as a player has been maddeningly inconsistent, with his play equal parts encouraging and disappointing over the course of the past few years. He frankly admitted that a potential move to Celtic falling through a year and a half ago affected his focus, and his form dipped enough that he lost any National Team favor he had with Bob Bradley and the fans.


Belgium's Jupiler League looks to be a perfect stepping stone for Kljestan, either as a place to make a name before making a move to a bigger stage, or as a place to get better, play more consistently, and eventually get himself into the National Team picture as an important player. There are simply not enough Americans with Sacha's creative abilities for anyone to give up on him; at 24 closing in on 25, four seasons in Europe might turn him into a late-bloomer ready to contribute in Brazil in 2014.


Anderlecht are a big Belgian club. They have a rich history and a demanding fan base, and are coming off a Jupiler League title last year (their 30th). If Kljestan can make his bones there, he'll be doing very well.


Oguchi Onyewu, though on a different career path, made himself into a quality defender while playing in Belgium. Perhaps Sacha, who few think will turn into anything special but who certainly has talent, can do the same at midfielder there. It bears careful watching.


Admittedly, I don't know enough about Anderlecht and their roster to know if Sacaha just started today because of weaker opposition, or if he's worked himself into a semi-permanent spot in the lineup. Nothing will drive USMNT and Americans abroad fans nuts more than a player wasting away on the bench. At his age, Sacha needs to play. If he does, it's possible he'll take a major step forward. With the frustration of missed European opportunities behind him, we just might see a different Sacha Kljestan.


A goal in his debut is a good start. It will be interesting to see if Sacha Kljestan, sometimes MLS star, turns into Sacha Kljestan, successful American in Europe.



MLS Cup - Los Angeles Galaxy v Real Salt Lake

After my dabbles in the world of over-excited, exclamation point-saturated writing over the last few weeks, it pains me to use the dreaded line-over-dot, even in a sarcastic sense. Yet there it is, because it adds to the effect of the headline; unless you're going to the the game I can't honestly find a reason to get too worked up about tomorrow's friendly in Carson.


But it is the National Team in action, and it will serve as an opportunity to see some younger and fringe players against real competition as they push for South Africa. The focus for many, like it is for Matt at US Soccer Daily, will be on Robbie Findley; the RSL striker is the best analogue for Charlie Davies currently available to Bob Bradley, and the hope is that he'll play and play well against Honduras. If Bradley is looking for a speedy option to fill the Davies role (not a given), then Findley will need to show he's capable against the Honduras "B" side to even gain consideration.


But, as Matt states (you stole my thunder, Matt), we can't put too much into anything that happens tomorrow. It's a friendly and it's Honduras "B". The "Kljestan Effect" is a very real possibility; if the Americans win, and a particular individual plays well, he'll immediately be pushed for the World Cup squad. Repeating Matt again, it's all about perspective.


Soccer: Sweden vs. USA

Sacha in January 2009


So when you're watching tomorrow night, naturally pulling for a US victory, and preferably a rout, make sure you view whatever happens through the proper lens. Bradley, setting his team up in a way that should give him the most possible information on certain players, will take things out of it you and I will never notice. But there will be obvious good and bad performances, players who step up and play over their respective heads, and others who fail or fall flat. From those things we can attempt to draw conclusions. They won't mean much.


In a World Cup year, even when the match in question is a "B" team friendly involving a large group of players who may never really figure in the National Team setup, it's almost impossible to relax. I intend to try, and I suggest you do the same; I'd like the Yanks to win, and I'd love to see some amazing performances, but nothing that happens will have any far reaching meaning.


Evidence of a Central Midfield

Thursday, September 24, 2009 | View Comments
USA v Mexico, FIFA World Cup Qualifier


Essien, Pirlo, Mascherano, Xavi, Iniesta, Kaka. These guys can deliver devastating tackles, brilliant balls over the top, immense pitch coverage, fantastic one-touch passing, penetrating runs, and jaw dropping dribbling. As diverse as their talents are, they all line up in the center midfield and create the backbones of their teams. They are charged either with being the engine for their team or shutting down the other team’s engine. Only in the central midfield can you find this diversity of talents and roles. While the quality of those above midfielders may not be available in the US talent pool, that level of diversity certainly is.

Eight players have staffed the US central midfield in the 13 “A” team games that have been played in 2009. While Mastroeni and Beckerman have played in games with the US “A” team, their time with the MNT is likely coming to a close; Mastroeni because of age and Beckerman because of better options. The rest of the US talent pool in the center of the pitch is young but experienced for their age. Bradley, Clark, Edu, Feilhaber, Kljestan, and Torres average only 23.3 years old but 20.7 caps. They are still developing, but have shown the brilliance of their potential and the mistakes of their youth.

I wanted to see how the US plays with these players on the field in a more concrete way than just by my own feelings about them. Similar to the hockey plus-minus stat, the table below shows each players minutes, the goals scored while they have been in the central midfield, the goals conceded while they have been in the central midfield, each of those numbers per game equivalent (where game equivalent equals 93 minutes with the extra three added for average second half stoppage time), and the difference between the two.

MinGSGCGS/GEGC/GE+/-
Bradley101618141.61.30.3
Clark5631252.00.81.2
Feilhaber310671.82.1-0.3
Kljestan288260.61.9-1.3
Mastroeni201431.91.40.5
Torres66232.84.2-1.4
Beckerman10000.00.00.0
Edu1000.00.00.0


But that’s only part of the story, because these are midfield pairings, who you are paired with matters too. Here’s where the subjectivity of this comes in. I am going to classify the central midfielders into three groups: more useful when the opponent has the ball (defensive), more useful when the US has the ball (offensive), equally useful (balanced). I classify Clark, Mastroeni, Beckerman, and Edu as defensive; Feilhaber and Torres as offensive; and Bradley and Kljestan as balanced. Below is a chart with all the different combinations that the US has played this year.

MinGSGCGS/GEGC/GE+/-
Def-Bal4941122.10.41.7
Bal-Bal252250.71.8-1.1
Bal-Off210562.22.7-0.5
Def-Off121322.31.50.8
Def-Bal-Off45020.04.0-4.0
Def-Def45112.02.00.0
Def-Bal-Bal18000.00.00.0
Bal14000.00.00.0
Def7000.00.00.0


The two tables show one thing very strongly; Sacha Kljestan has been terrible for the US this year. While Torres’ defensive numbers are not great, the statistical analysis there suffers from an overall lack of minutes and being skewed by the three man center midfield disaster that was the Costa Rica first half. Kljestan has no such excuses. His removal from a lineup has generally been followed by a US goal (Mexico) or two (at El Salvador), while his insertion is generally followed by an opposition goal (Italy and Brazil). Because of terrible play when Kljestan is in the lineup, the Bal-Bal combination has suffered greatly. The other three combinations that the US has frequently used shows a stable trend:

MinGSGCGS/GEGC/GE+/-
Def-Bal4941122.10.41.7
Def-Off121322.31.50.8
Bal-Off210562.22.7-0.5


As the more defensive players are replaced by more offensive players, the goals conceded rises; however, the number of goals scored does not significantly change. An analysis of the numbers separated from player bias, stylistic leanings, and form arguments shows that the US should start its matches with a pairing of a defensive midfielder and a balanced center midfielder with an attacking option off the bench to replace the balanced player when a late goal is needed. In that case, there is a slightly higher likelihood of scoring without selling out the back against the counter. In games where an Off has replaced a Def by red card (Italy when Feilhaber moved to the middle after Clark was tossed) or substitution (Mexico, again Feilhaber for Clark) the US has allowed 3 goals and scored 1 in 74 minutes; whereas a Off has never been brought in for a Bal.

Until Edu returns, Clark is the only top defensive midfielder the US has. Likewise until Jones is eligible and healed, Bradley is the only good option as a balanced midfielder. While their play might be ugly, the objective results of their pairing is hard to argue with. In 370 minutes with them on the pitch together, the US has scored eight goals and conceded one or 2.0 goals scored per game and 0.3 goals conceded per game.

Central midfield pairings can be defensive, possessive, creative, attacking, or some combination of these things. The goal should be to find the pairing that gives a team the best chance to win. For whatever reason, the US bleeds goals when anything nearing an offensively minded midfield is played, and those more offensively minded players have not contributed to the attack enough to offset that loss. When healthy and not suspended, objectively the pairing of Clark and Bradley puts the US in the best position to win. That being said, the statistics make a strong case for looking at the pairing of Torres and Clark; as the strike rate with Torres on the field is the highest of any midfielder and Clark’s low concede rate may balance that midfield nicely.





The bargain bin is full here on the MFUSA countdown, step right up and make a deal...

Number Two: Summer Sales

It seemingly happens every year: young MLS players are linked to a move abroad during the European summer transfer window. This year should be no exception, with several big names expected to be transfer targets. Both Kenny Cooper and Sacha Kjlestan have flirted with moves before, and the smart money has at least one of them completing a move. The X-factor in every outbound MLS transfer is the league itself, as headquarter's valuation of players can drastically effect the level of interest from foreign clubs. Both Cooper and Kljestan should draw offers, and it will be up to the league and the MLS club in question to determine each player's future. The fortunes of those clubs could go a long way towards determining whether a sale is actually completed; FC Dallas' outlook is decidely bleaker than a Chivas USA side that is coming off of a playoff appearance in '08, and it will be interesting to see if the Texans decide to throw in the towel early. As always seems to happen, a player who is not on the list of expected transfer targets could pop up to surprise us all.

Don't forget Landon Donovan; while a sale of the all-time leading USMNT goal scorer is unlikely, the topic will come up. Expect the league to set a high price, scaring off any European suitors.






Bradley Conference Call Breakdown

Monday, February 09, 2009 | View Comments
Fair warning: VERY LONG POST

Bob Bradley held a conference call for the press today, and covered several topics related to the upcoming match with Mexico. The original audio is here, and a transcript of the proceedings is here. Listening the full audio requires a bit of a time commitment, at least party due to the fact that Mr. Bradley is very deliberate with his responses (the number of "uhs" from Bob would make for a great drinking game; you'd be plastered by the midpoint of the call).

I've selected a few of BB's answers on which I would like to comment:

Opening statement:
"It’s nice to have everybody on the call. We’re finally here in Columbus. It seems like we’ve been talking about this game for a long time and there is an excitement level everywhere we go. Of the players that we’ve called in, Landon will arrive later today, as will Jose Torres, but the rest of the players have arrived and we’re anxious to get a good training in this afternoon and get ready for the match."

Nothing to comment on here, just wanted to provide Bob's open for anyone who might not get a chance to listen to the audio or read the transcript.

On the veteran leadership on the roster:
"Throughout qualifying we’ve relied heavily on that core of veterans. I think they help set a good tone in every camp and they understand what these games are all about. In the first game of a final round against a rival like Mexico, I think that kind of experience will be very, very important. We’re looking to those guys to lead us on the field."

I think this is a fairly strong indication that Ching will start up front and Frankie in the back (the question specifcally mentioned those two players); as talented as Jozy is, Bob realizes how important experience will be in the match. Ching's a lot less likely to get butterflies over going up against the likes of Rafa Marquez.

On what he saw in Jozy Altidore that pushed him onto the roster:
"We think about the camps he’s been in and the games he’s played for us and we still see some qualities that we think fit well into our group. In a year where he has had some changes, and obviously just been put on loan, we still felt that having him in this camp, talking to him, seeing where he is and having him ready to go is important and something that will help our team."

This was the very next question, after speaking on the importance of the vets. I got the sense that maybe Bob felt the need to defend his inclusion of Jozy, although it's clear from his answer that he wanted to expose the young striker to the environment that comes with a Mexico match. Bob expands on the importance of the environment for the young players in a later answer.

On whether he will play cautiously:
"There is the possibility of rain on Wednesday and I expect that the field is going to be fast. I think that early in the game it will be important to try to be the team that is aggressive in an intelligent way, trying to play in the other team’s end, connecting passes and finding a rhythm, trying to jump on the loose balls. Certainly in a game like this, beginning this round, the expectation is that the game will start out at a very fast tempo and we want to be ready for that."

It sounds like Bob is letting on that the Americans may come right at the Mexicans, something that National Team observers will know it a little out of character for the coach. I'm inclined to take a "I'll believe it when I see it" attitude, but at least Bob is giving lip-service to attacking (to begin the game at least).

On whether it was important to limit the roster to 20 players:
"We figured all along that we’d bring in between 20 and 23 players. One factor is that it’s a single fixture date which just doesn’t give you that much time. You have to have some starting points when they come in but there will always be some decisions. We have a very short period of time to size things up. Players come in that haven’t played as much, but the flip side is guys that played on the weekend and we have to assess very quickly where they are physically. That’s sort of the way it works on a single fixture date and we felt that this was a good starting point for making those decisions."

This is a subject that has some National Team supporters a little nervous; the fact that a lot of the big American guns haven't played together in months and only have a day or two to get acclimated to each other again can't be a good thing. There's bound to be rust to open the game, and the Americans may have to survive on energy and hustle alone for a period. Whoever ends up stating in the midfield will need to get something going quickly to keep the Mexican attack from dominating.

On whether there is a psychological advantage playing in Columbus:
"For the guys who have played in those games I think there is a good feeling about playing here. They enjoy the crowd that comes and roots us on. I think the fact that it’s a smaller stadium really ensures that the atmosphere on the inside of the stadium is great. As I mentioned earlier, especially when you play this time of year, the fact is that it’s going to be a fast field and a fast game. We’ve mentioned that a number of times over the past few years that when you play at night and the field is quick, it is really the kind of game that players get excited for. They all knew that would be part of Columbus and that’s certainly a good edge for us."

Bob mentioning the fast field again. Obviously this is something that is very much on his mind. Keep this in mind as we move towards the game; all of Bob's decision at likely to be effected by this fast field factor.

On whether Mexico likes playing in Columbus:
"I’m not sure, but we hope so. I think when the game starts, there is going to be a lot of energy at the beginning of the game and we’re going to have to concentrate on getting the upper hand and playing our game."

Bad transcription here; Bob's answer was actually to the question of whether or not the Mexican's don't like playing in Columbus.

On whether he is concerned about the sharpness of players who haven’t been playing much with their club:
"Yes, that is a concern. Those are decisions that we make as a staff and sometimes in a training session, you don’t always get a great answer but you get a gut feeling, and in other cases you’re going on past experiences and a track record. There is no set way to make those decisions but certainly the fact that some guys haven’t been playing as much is a concern."

A concern, certainly, but there's no way around playing guys that haven't been getting minutes recently. Essentially this is a non-answer, because Bob can pick and choose reasons for playing certain players, no matter their current situation.

On Mexico’s current form:
"We have a lot of respect for Mexico. The previous round of qualifying was a weird one for them. With the hurricane they played their first three games at home, they won each of those games and I think they took their foot off the gas. As we all know, away games in qualifying will always be difficult. When I watch them I still see the qualities of all the good Mexican teams, players that are good on the ball, mobility and the way they do things as a group and there are some individually talented guys, so we prepare for that."

Coach-speak all the way, but probably a fair assessment on Bob's part. Mexico's struggles last year have absolutely no bearing on Wednesday night.

On Jose Torres’ qualities and experience against Mexico players:
"Jose is a player who is good with the ball, he sees things quickly. We’ve had him in a couple of camps and we’ve always felt good about the simple way that he connects the game to people around him. We’re excited that he’s a part of our national team and we’ll see him later today and I think that he’s someone who can help us in this game."

Listening to the audio, it seemed like Bob was maybe dreading this question. He obviously had to know it was coming, and the reporter who asked the question was obviously a native-Spanish speaker. It's nice to see that Bradley is considering Torres, if only because it give solace to those in the supporter community who want to see the kid play against Mexico.

On how the team will gel with only a few days of training together:
"With the national team you have to believe that previous matches and training camps all start to build a foundation and that every time you come together, you can pick up where you left off. It is totally different than coaching a club team. You rely on a core group of players, leaders that set a tone in the camps. The way that we do things, the environment that we’ve created, we’ve tried to have as simple and solid a routine as possible so that every time we get together we can continue the good work."

The answer is truncated; Bob specifically mentioned the "rhythm" managing a club versus managing a country. Continuity is something that the US certainly has on their side leading up to the hexagonal, as Bob's been on the job long enough to establish the "foundation" he talks about. Whether you like Bob or not, I think it's fair to say that the length of his tenure to this point can only help a team that must assemble quickly. He knows the players (for the most part), and they know him.

On whether he is disappointed to not have cold weather for this game:
"No, I think that we felt it was important to play in conditions that fit what a lot of the players have been playing in lately. Given that we do have a group of players that come from Europe I think the weather here on Wednesday will fit very closely with the weather they’ve been training in and playing in. I also think, which I believe is important, that when you’re playing a game around these temperatures, in terms of creating a fast game, a good game, some of my favorite games were played in these conditions. I don’t think we’re too concerned that it’s not that cold. I think it’s got all the makings of a great situation for the game."

The weather theme runs through the conference, and Bradley did his best to deflect as much of the "disappointment" as possible. He certainly couldn't answer this question (and another later on) by moaning about the unseasonably warm weather that's hit Columbus this week.

On Mexico arriving two days earlier than usual to prepare for the game:
"They also have a number of players coming in from Europe. I think they understand what that’s all about. I read something the other day where a comment was made about Nery Castillo and I think that when you play for Shakhtar Donetsk you’re not that worried about cold weather. I think they have a core group that comes from playing in those conditions and I have to assume they felt that it would help the rest of them to be here for a few days leading up to the game."

Bob's got a point about this one, but I still think their is a bit of an "institutional" problem when it comes to the Mexicans and the weather. The same applied for the Americans in Azteca; the physical realities of the situation are often outweighed by the mental hurdles those realities present. With the weather as it will be, it's a moot point anyway.

On the play of Sacha Kljestan:
"I think it’s been important for Sacha to develop a more complete game, to continue to improve and play at a higher level, to play an important role on the national team. You have to be able to take the things that you do and make them count more when the games are faster, harder and more difficult. I think like some of our other younger players, he’s in that process right now and we continue to see things that show us that he’s picking up on certain things that he’s improving. We’re also seeing some other things that we can point out that need to get better."

It looks like Bradley's indicating that he still expects more out of Sacha defensively. It looks like he may start though, so let's hope he can adjust to the pace, intensity, and gravity of the Mexico game quickly.

On whether the U.S. is producing more good, young players:
"It’s an important part of any team. Charlie [Davies] and Robbie [Rogers] are good examples of players who have those qualities and they have been in the camp throughout January and we feel like there is good progress being made."

I'm including this because Bradley is mentioned a couple of players that some supporters have pissed and moaned about being in the squad. Like Jozy, Bob might have included them in the camp simply to expose them to the atmosphere surrounding the game. We'll see if they are on the bench come Wednesday.

On the qualities of forward Brian Ching:
"Brian is a player that, anyone who has been on his team has tremendous respect for what he brings. He’s a player that goes into the spots on the field that really count. He makes plays in those areas which is obviously what a forward has to be about. He works very hard for the team. He’s a threat to score goals and because of the way he works for others, he’s always a guy who helps create opportunities for the players around him."

The question leading to this response was asked by Glenn Davis of the Houston Chronicle, just to add some context. Nothing here leads me to believe that Ching isn't starting, but then again, he was specifically asked about the striker, and Bob's certainly wasn't going to downplay his abilities after including him in the squad.

On whether there is a different mentality before a game against Mexico:
"Yes, you can tell from the way everybody arrived that there is a focus and a sense of excitement about playing Mexico."

The most obvious question and answer in the bunch.

On Landon Donovan’s play at Bayern Munich:
"Landon has done well to establish himself in a team like that in a short amount of time. They have so much talent that it’s not easy to break through. Even a day like yesterday where he comes on as a sub, the score is tied 1-1 and he’s coming on for Luca Toni. That is a great statement in itself. As far as the future is concerned, obviously not all of it is in Landon’s control and that’s sometimes the way it works for a player. But I think the fact that he is looking for new challenges is important and if that continues to be the way he looks at things, I expect that there will be new places that he goes to down the road."

Nice words for Landon; as a follow up to this, Bradley was asked if he thought Landon should stay with Bayern. His answer: "Yes."

On whether Freddy Adu was considered for this camp:
"Yes, he was considered. Without getting specific to any one player, if you look at the bigger pool of players that participated throughout qualifiers last year, it gives everybody a sense of the pool. There are many different considerations that we look at when we put a group together. I already mentioned that single-fixture dates are particularly challenging because of the short turnaround. Freddy is a guy that’s in our pool and a player that will continue to be looked at every time we come together."

Bob moved the answer from the specific to the general very quickly, and indication that he doesn't want to speak ill of Freddy. From the answer, though, it's obvious that Freddy's club situation was viewed as too big of an inpediment to his being included for this game. Maybe Bob knows something we don't, and Freddy's on the verge of minutes at Monaco (hey, you never know).

On how the U.S. sometimes comes together to form a team that’s greater than the sum of its parts:
"I think the most important thing is how much it means to every one of these guys every time they get called in. When you go to Europe and try to have a career there, it’s not always easy. Players miss certain things about being in the U.S. and so there is a great camaraderie in this group of guys every time we come together. The first day they’re catching up on all sorts of things and I think that has always been a great thing to see. As coaches we always try to say that it’s a really important starting point every time we get together."

While I guess it's fine for now that the team is "greater than the sum of its parts", here's to hoping that one day the team is sucessful while being equal to the sum of its parts (meaning we have high quality players all over the pitch).

On whether players feel that they have something to prove as Americans:
"Yes, that is true. Players are always trying to prove how much progress we’ve made in the United States. They’ve realized that accomplishments in the United States don’t count for much in Europe. That feeling exists and is certainly part of the motivation."

No respect, I tell ya, no respect.

On whether the U.S. will be affected by the unseasonably warm weather:
"I don’t know for sure, but I doubt it will be 60 degrees at kickoff. I still think it will be the type of conditions that make for a good game. That’s what we were hoping for when we decided to come to Columbus, together with the kind of support that U.S. has always received when playing here."

I can't remember who asked this question, but it clearly had a snarky tone. The reported mentioned that it would be 60 degrees on Wednesday, hence Bob's response. Again, he's downplaying the weather (as he should).

On the progression of Charlie Davies:
"Charlie left Boston College, went to Sweden and the first year in Sweden was not easy. His adjustment there took time and last year was an important step for him. He became a regular and he started scoring pretty regularly, which is one of the most important things for a forward. When we’ve had him back in camp we see that he has matured in these ways. He has great physical qualities. He’s still figuring out certain things like movement on the field and his concentration at times. Having him for a month has been great. If he was sitting here he’d know that in that month he had good days and he had days that weren’t as good as I thought they should be, but that’s all part of it. The bar gets higher and I think he’s responding pretty well to these challenges."

It's looking more and more like Davies is a Bradley favorite, and I'm sure we'll see a lot of him this year.

On the pressure that the Mexican players and coaches are under:
"Certainly, the press in Mexico pays a tremendous amount of attention to the national team and with that comes pressure. The players are experienced with the press and they understand that. Sven-Goran Eriksson is experienced, too. It’s not the same in the United States, but nonetheless, as we continue to grow as a soccer country, more and more of that does take place. It has been mentioned that the U.S. has done well to earn its position in CONCACAF and we understand that there has been success in the past and that every time we step on the field, we have the responsibility to continue that progress. So, there is pressure, but it’s a little different than they have in Mexico. Coaches and players understand that that’s part of the game."

The pressure on Bradley and the pressue on Eriksson are barely in the same solar system, much less the same ballpark. With no frame of reference, I'm sure Bob feels somewhat pressured; he obviously knows that it pales in comparison to what Eriksson and the Mexican players get, but as an abstract concept, he might now completely appreciate it. I hope the pressure on Bradley (or whomever has the job) increases exponentially, both as a way of ensuring constant diligence in the position as well as because it will indicate a greater passion for the game in the US.

So there you go. Overall, there wasn't much groundbreaking information shared, but it did give the scribes some quotes to run with. I gleaned a couple of things from the call: one, Bob is more concerned with the pitch conditions and their potential quickness than he is with the weather (although I'm sure he would not mind a sudden cold nap Wednesday night), and two, he seems amenable to blooding one or two of the young players in the match. Simply from what he said, I think there's a decent chance we'll see Jose Francisco Torres come on in the second half.

Anyone else with any thoughts?


USA-Sweden Non-Recap Plus

Monday, January 26, 2009 | View Comments
No one needs a recap of the game from me, so that's not what this is; instead, I just wanted to hit on a couple of things (including USA-Sweden) from the weekend.

I mentioned that all I really cared about from the USA-Sweden game was a bit of magic from Sacha and something good from Cooper or Davies. We certainly got the magic from Sacha, but Cooper and Davies failed to produce. Brian Ching played very well, and I'm starting to turn the corner on him a bit. Ching's not flashy, and his age is a strike against him, but he consistenly does good things on the pitch that helps his team win. The play he made to set up Sacha for the last goal was very nice.

Speaking of Sacha, the subject of his potential transfer to Celtic is big news. The piece places Celtic among several other suitors, and indicates that the move may not be as inevitbale as all of the press (and Sacha's performance on Saturday) would seem to make it. In fact, Sacha's hat trick is already being mentioned as a reason the transfer won't go through. The feeling appears to be that Sacha's performance will lead MLS to up the asking price for the midfielder, putting him out of Celtic's range. This story (which says that Sacha is a Serbian immigrant: um, no) reports the current offer at just under 2 million pounds (as of today, that's about $2.8 million; there is no chance MLS and Chivas lets Sacha go for that little).

It appears that Kljestan may be the guy that we all expected Freddy to become for 2010; I just hope, if he does move to Scotland, that Sacha gets playing time. It would be a disaster if he ends up wasting away on the bench like Freddy has to this point.


This, That and the Other

Thursday, January 15, 2009 | View Comments
A couple of things of note happened (or were reported on) today:

The MLS SuperDraft happened.

As I've said before, I don't know enough about any of the players to comment on the "winners" and "losers" in the draft (and I definitely won't be grading). I will say that for some reason, the Generation Adidas kids excite me a lot more than any of the others. That probably has something to do with most of them being sophomores or juniors, which means they're hitting the professional ranks at 19 or 20 instead of 21 or 22. As a soccer nation we've got to get our heads around the idea that kids need to be in professional environments as soon possible (like when they get zits, or when that crazy Jennifer-Tilly-one-second-Barry-White-the-next voice thing starts to happen). We can't just apply this plan to the obvious prodigies (Adu, Altidore, etc.) anymore.

Atlanta pulling out of the expansion race happened.

This story appeared today in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, and I came by it through The 24th Minute. All I can really say is, good riddance. Atlanta's no where near ready for a team, no matter how much cash Arthur Blank has stashed in the tanks of the toilets in the kitchen and bath section. A "presence" in any geographical area should never be a compelling reason to place an expansion team, and that's all Atlanta really had going for it.

Sacha Kljestan heading to Glasgow for a trial happened.

And no, it's not Rangers, the current club of American internationals Beasley and Edu: it's Rangers' bitter rival, Celtic. Ives is reporting the story, so you know it's true, and it's certainly a huge opportunity for Sacha. I've stated in this space before that I'm all for young Americans getting quality coaching in Europe; although I will say that it's a bit of a double-edged sword when it comes to marketing MLS. It's difficult not to be excited at the possibilities though, when one's first allegiance lies with the National Team (as mine does).

FIFA soliciting for bids for World Cup 2018 & 2022 happened.

This is a bit of a non-story, but the U.S. is almost certain to bid for one (or both) of these cups. Of course I want to see the World Cup return to the states, mostly for selfish reasons, but also because of the massive exposure it will give the game in this counrty. The American soccer scene today bears almost no resemblance to that of '94, so the effect a World Cup could have would be massive. Even better that the U.S would be a much stronger side than in '94, and would play in front of a much more vocal, soccer-savvy fan base.

Comments, concerns, complaints?


    KKTC Bahis Siteleri, Online Bahis

    Legal


    Privacy Policy